The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the workplace in ways we could not have imagined just a few months ago. Indeed, the economic impact caused by the COVID-19-related shutdowns has prompted many employers to reevaluate how to conduct business and the number of employees they need. Consequently, many employers have been compelled to consider reductions in force. While not limited to times of pandemic, the basic principles apply.

Commonly, employers approach the exercise with a plan in mind: Which business lines are affected? How much payroll do we need to shed? What are the criteria for selection? Which employees will be selected for reduction? Who will make the selections? And more …. In addition, employers should consider the impact of their selections on groups of individuals of a certain demographic.

Considering Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, for example, employers should ask whether the rate at which females are selected for reduction is greater than the rate at which males are selected? How are minority employees faring against non-minority employees? And, considering the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, what about older employees as compared to younger employees? Additionally, are the differences in rates statistically significant? A disparate impact analysis can help answer these questions and possibly substantially mitigate risk for employers.

What if there is statistically significant disparate impact against a particular demographic? Confirm the criteria used to select the individuals for reduction are “consistent with business necessity” under Title VII. If a criterion does not meet the standard, revisit the selection(s).

Remember, intent need not come into the equation as these analyses examine the impact facially neutral selection criteria may be having on certain demographic groups. Of course, protected characteristics generally should not be included among the criteria being used to select individuals for selection. Be mindful of the importance and applicability of the attorney-client privilege when conducting these analyses and consider retaining a law firm to help.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Taylor M. Napoli Taylor M. Napoli

Taylor M. Napoli is an associate in the Long Island, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. Her practice focuses on preparing affirmative action plans for federal contractors and defending federal contractors in audits by the United States Department of Labor Office of…

Taylor M. Napoli is an associate in the Long Island, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. Her practice focuses on preparing affirmative action plans for federal contractors and defending federal contractors in audits by the United States Department of Labor Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP).

Taylor assists federal contractors in the preparation of affirmative action plans and EEO-1 and VETS-4212 reports, and defends contractors against allegations of discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, gender identity, national origin, disability, and veteran status in connection with audits by the OFCCP and in related litigation brought on OFCCP’s behalf by the Solicitor’s Office at the U.S. Department of Labor. She also provides counsel on state affirmative action obligations and assists clients in the design and implementation of proactive pay equity analyses.